There is good news and bad news from the Chicago Federal Reserve which said that 2011 will be a tough year in local government finance. Minimal growth or outright declines in property tax revenues, reduced assistance from state governments, and requirements to make larger payments to underfunded public pension funds will loom large for many local governments. However, if history is any guide, few local governments will either default on their municipal bonds or end up in bankruptcy. The aftermath of actual local government bankruptcies—such as that of Vallejo, CA, in 2008—suggest that governments are hurt badly when they emerge from bankruptcy, particularly in their ability to issue debt. And so, in all but the most dire cases, local governments under stress are likely to take alternative steps to shore up their fiscal positions.
Muni Bond Talk
Archive for the ‘Market Commentary’ Category
Chicago Federal Reserve Says Dont Worry About Muni Defaults
Monday, May 2nd, 2011Special Assessment Bonds Trigger 2009 Muni Defaults
Thursday, October 15th, 2009Muni bond defaults moved past $4 billion from January thru September 2009 driven partly by the bursting of the real estate bubble which in turn triggered defaults in “Special Assessment” bonds, according to the Distressed Debt Securities Newsletter and Bloomberg.
The problem is caused by builders who issued tax-exempt bonds backed by these Special Assessment bonds to finance infrastructure, such as new schools. Builders are not paying the tax debt as houses go unsold and land values decline. For example in Adelanto, California, about $17 million in bonds defaulted as school construction proceeded faster than home building. The real estate crash caused fewer people to move into the area which means less tax revenue to support new schools. Special Assessment bonds are a real specialty area.
BondView.com can help you learn more about Special Assessment bonds…. 1) Take a look at all California Special Assessment bonds traded within the last 24 hours, see up to date yield curves for these bonds, or get an objective view of own muni bond portfolio. Or 2) For more info about Special Assessment Bonds contact an industry leader: David Taussig & Associates
(In the interests of full disclosure, BondView is not paid for this recommendation. We are just sharing our industry contacts with you.)




Muni Investors Looking Good in Vallejo, CA
Saturday, May 28th, 2011Vallejo, California, the biggest U.S. city in bankruptcy, won court permission to send its exit plan to creditors, its municipal bondholders for a vote after retired workers dropped their objections. In summary, “The plan doesn’t alter securities tied to designated revenue sources, such as about $175 million in water revenue bonds, and other special tax obligations secured by special revenue of the city’s restricted funds, according to the documents. ”
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael S. McManus in Sacramento, California, approved a disclosure statement for the plan in an order. McManus will take creditors’ votes into account when he decides whether to approve the plan at a hearing to be scheduled in the coming weeks. A hearing on the disclosure statement had been set for today. The retirees, represented by a court-sanctioned committee, were the last major objectors to the plan, which would cut labor costs and stretch out payments to other creditors.“The committee was concerned if the bankruptcy dragged on, their actual pensions might be jeopardized,’’ R. Dale Ginter, an attorney for the committee, said in a May 23 interview. During the bankruptcy, the city succeeded in cutting costs by firing employees, renegotiating union contracts and reducing what it pays to subsidize retiree health care. Vallejo, a onetime U.S. Navy town of about 120,000 on San Francisco Bay, sought protection from creditors in May 2008 under Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, after the recession eroded tax revenue and unions rejected wage cuts. Chapter 9 allows municipalities to reorganize debt rather than liquidate. The plan doesn’t alter securities tied to designated revenue sources, such as about $175 million in water revenue bonds, and other special tax obligations secured by special revenue of the city’s restricted funds, according to the documents. The case is In re City of Vallejo, 08-26813, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of California (Sacramento).” Source: Today’s (5-27-11) Bloomberg Municipal Market Brief.
Another great American tradition is found in the millions of decisions that pass through and from our court system. We are a nation of law. We have a system that respects contracts. It carries with it the notion that obligations that are undertaken are to be fulfilled in economic terms if they are reasonable.
Vallejo’s municipal bankruptcy occurred because the politicians who ran the city ignored these fundamental values and obligated the city taxpayers to unreasonable burdens. Now the court is throwing these excessively costly burdens out. After $10 million of litigation, we are getting to some resolution. Meanwhile, please note the highlighted portion of this news report. It states that the payment stream for the essential-service revenue bond that funded the supply of water to the city is intact.
Many have emphasized importance of essential-service revenue and of the legal construction that protects these bond holders. Here is a prime example. The city is in bankruptcy, yet the bond holder is getting paid.
Reposted with permission from our friends at Cumberland Advisors.
Tags: bondview, credit ratings, municipal bond defaults, S&P downgrade
Posted in Market Commentary, municipal bond defaults | No Comments »